ad To appear in The Academy of Management history Towards a Fairer figure of Process Fairness: Why, When and How More may Not ceaselessly Be Better Than Less Joel Brockner Batia M. Wiesenfeld Kristina A. Diekmann capital of South Carolina University New York University University of Utah April 7, 2009 We ar agreeable to Steve Blader, Art Brief, whirl Grant, Joshua Margolis, Andy Molinsky, Harris Sondak, Bill Swann, Kees Van den Bos, and Jim Walsh for their reformatory comments on an earliest version of the manuscript. Abstract Process nicety refers to passels perceptions of how sensibly they are treated in the function of interacting with another party. conceptually distinct from outcome loveliness, it subsumes procedural fairness, social fairness, and the li ke. As recipients of decisions, we by and large want to be treated with more(prenominal) than sooner than with less cognitive operation fairness. As agents of decisions, we often would rather plan and follow through them with more rather than with less fulfil fairness.
Whereas the organizational justice literature generally extols the virtues of high affect fairness, recent guess and seek suggest that when it comes to process fairness, more is not unceasingly better than less. We discuss why, when, and how quite a littles general disposition to desire higher process fairness over piss process fairness m ay be attenuated, eliminated, or tied(p) re! versed. Our analysis is organized by the notion that under many conditions, receiving or acting with high process fairness prevents people from satisfying some of their basic mental motives, such as their needs to feel good nearly themselves or to preserve a sense of control. Future research directions also are considered. Psychologists and philosophers alike have long suggested that fairness is a aboriginal value in social lifetime (Adams, 1965; Rawls, 1971), manifesting...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment