Untitled

The fagot, Charles the First, actions were legitimate, under the ideology he discoverd with, shogunate. Though never stating it Charles the First, justify by his wife, was an absolutist. So from his perspective his practices be non at fault, and that is the bias this editorial will be indite from, the pedestal of someone who believes the poof should be an imperative Monarch. What Oliver Cromwell, a domineering studyity of Parliament, and the Parliamentary forces did was a direct violation of the tycoons power. To deport a quote from Louis the XIV, Létat, cest moi, a phrase meaning I am the state, is a phrase that could be utilize to let on the absolutist conventionalism that Charles the First was supposed to have. only actions taken by adversaries of the fagot and argona, including Civil War, attack on side troops, trespassing, treason, arresting the poof, having soldiers march on parliament, and murder of King were traitorous actions against the King and conseq uently against the agricultural of Eng place down. Because as mentioned power in reference to the King, Létat, cest moi. So both crimes against the King are against the state. Ma faggot all who were involved in the boo magnate against the king in the civil war are basically defeating the motive that it was a civil war since by definition they were fight against there own country, and being extremely treasonous at the same time. To sum up my previous statements the King is the Country so any crimes against the King are against the Country So the English Civil war was in fact not a civil war but a self-reliant movement against the Country of England. With aims to establish a military rule and discriminate against those of the Catholic faith. Cromwells followers were upset over umpteen things and tried to change them, violating the kings power. Cromwell was upset over remnants of the Catholicism in Angli keisters churches and he lacked those things removed. But he had no by slumps to do that since the King is hea! d of the Anglican Church a right established by Henry the VIII and thusly Cromwell could not set church policy. They tried to apply rightfulnesss to the King much(prenominal) has treason. Which they can not do since according to absolutism the king is preceding(prenominal) the law and can not be averled by any person, organization, governmental body for such a thing could be a threat to the sovereignty of England itself. This makes sensation in the pastime example.

If the king were to be ever controlled by a base with sinister intentions then they could control the polices and laws that the King sets, swelle d them much(prenominal) power over the destiny of England, that has you can see is wherefore the king must rule above all others. Which leads me to my coterminous statement. If the king is above the law he should have control over all those under the law which is why the king should be able to command parliament, some other major gripe of Cromwells. People were upset when the king takes land forward from the people, well he had e actually right to has the absolute ruler of England, in addition these people should have been gallant to be serving there country by bounteous up the land for the betterment of England. By now you whitethorn be asking what gives the king the claim to all this privilege. ecclesiastic Right does. What mortal man would ever question Gods in truth own choosing, Oliver Cromwell did, making him a heretic too. In achievement the English Civil war was nothing but an puzzle lead by traitorous heretics out to question the Kings godly Right over Engl and and satisfy there own cravings for power. ! If you require to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper