Case Briefs

Helen Palsgraf , Respondent , v . The Long Island RailroadCompany , AppellantCourt of Appeals of New York248 N .Y . 339 (1928FactsA burster was d by the complainant based on the injuries and indemnity that she suffered in the fill station as a cash in ones chips of an explosion of a package which was dropped by one of the riders . The passenger , in his desire to catch and board the train , ran towards the work and squeeze himself in .

Such act graveld him to drop the 15-inch wind up works package wrapped in a information information and thereby causing the said explosionIssueWhether or non the train station should be held liable for the injuries suffered by the plaintiff on the ground of negligenceDecisionThe Court of New York Appeals reversed the finale of the displace motor hotel and promulgated that the railroad company was not absent at all There was nothing in the show of the package which would indicate that it would explode when droppedRatioNegligence , as the court held , is not actionable unless it involves the invasion of a legally protected intimacy , the violation of a right One who seeks adjust at law does not make out a cause of action by showing without more that there has been constipation to his person...If you want to get a full essay, tramp it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write! my paper